<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Read wrote Wright&#8230; Graph Theorists playing with words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ashutoshmehra.net/blog/2009/03/read-wrote-wright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ashutoshmehra.net/blog/2009/03/read-wrote-wright/</link>
	<description>Notes on Math, Computer Science &#38; Programming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 03:39:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashutosh</title>
		<link>http://ashutoshmehra.net/blog/2009/03/read-wrote-wright/comment-page-1/#comment-1548</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashutosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 01:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ashutoshmehra.net/blog/?p=271#comment-1548</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I like the play :-)
Another interesting &quot;name play&quot; happens in the story of R H Bing&#039;s passport: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._H._Bing#What_does_R._H._stand_for.3F</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I like the play :-)<br />
Another interesting &#8220;name play&#8221; happens in the story of R H Bing&#8217;s passport: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._H._Bing#What_does_R._H._stand_for.3F" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._H._Bing#What_does_R._H._stand_for.3F</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: svat</title>
		<link>http://ashutoshmehra.net/blog/2009/03/read-wrote-wright/comment-page-1/#comment-1547</link>
		<dc:creator>svat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 07:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ashutoshmehra.net/blog/?p=271#comment-1547</guid>
		<description>Wonderful, thanks!

I think it&#039;s the first one (with a little bit of the last). Not necessarily a *serious* priority dispute, but often with events like this, different authors have different recollections of what happened. Here, presumably, Read thinks he wrote about the error to Wright first, while Wright thinks it was the other way around. Usually not worth mentioning, but the authors chose to add the sentence for the play on words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful, thanks!</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s the first one (with a little bit of the last). Not necessarily a *serious* priority dispute, but often with events like this, different authors have different recollections of what happened. Here, presumably, Read thinks he wrote about the error to Wright first, while Wright thinks it was the other way around. Usually not worth mentioning, but the authors chose to add the sentence for the play on words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

